<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spammers Find Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://plzkthxbai.com/blog/2009/05/10/spammers-find-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://plzkthxbai.com/blog/2009/05/10/spammers-find-twitter/</link>
	<description>Blogging the web, technology, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:20:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Barnoff</title>
		<link>http://plzkthxbai.com/blog/2009/05/10/spammers-find-twitter/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Barnoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 13:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plzkthxbai.com/blog/?p=492#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Twitter is on the right track with their blog post that you linked to.  I think they should have an incrementing cap system.  This cap would allow a user to request to follow 20 people in their first week, 30 their second... ect.

Another cap that may work would be a lower following limit followed by a ratio cap.  The lower following limit would allow a new user to request to follow 50 users, then they would be required to meet a ratio of following::followers.  This ratio could increase slowly over time as a users&#039; credibility increases.

These solutions would deter the spamming but still give serious users the freedom they have now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is on the right track with their blog post that you linked to.  I think they should have an incrementing cap system.  This cap would allow a user to request to follow 20 people in their first week, 30 their second&#8230; ect.</p>
<p>Another cap that may work would be a lower following limit followed by a ratio cap.  The lower following limit would allow a new user to request to follow 50 users, then they would be required to meet a ratio of following::followers.  This ratio could increase slowly over time as a users&#8217; credibility increases.</p>
<p>These solutions would deter the spamming but still give serious users the freedom they have now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

